The Canadian Farm Family at Work: Exploring Gender and Generation by Center for Rural Studies and Enrichment, National Farmers Union | 18 May 2005 This is the result of a study (2002) that tries to assess the changes that had taken place over the past 20 years in the work of Canadian farm women in the context of the farm family, encompassing the contributions of women, men and youth. The study found that Canadian farm women continue to be heavily involved on the farm and over the past 20 years, their contributions have increased in almost all areas of the farm operation. Transferring the farm to the next generation is very important to Canadian farm families. Yet there are families who are reticent to transfer the farm to their children because of the stress and uncertainty within agriculture. This is the result of a study (2002) that tries to assess the changes that had taken place over the past 20 years in the work of Canadian farm women in the context of the farm family, encompassing the contributions of women, men and youth. The study found that Canadian farm women continue to be heavily involved on the farm and over the past 20 years, their contributions have increased in almost all areas of the farm operation. Transferring the farm to the next generation is very important to Canadian farm families. Yet there are families who are reticent to transfer the farm to their children because of the stress and uncertainty within agriculture.
Farmers' Experiences with Agricultural Research - a workshop report by BASA-SANFEC | 18 May 2005 A workshop report of Farmers Experiences with Agricultural Research - an international farmers' workshop held in Thailand and Cambodia on 14-20 December 2004 A workshop report of Farmers Experiences with Agricultural Research - an international farmers' workshop held in Thailand and Cambodia on 14-20 December 2004
Fruits of Diversity by Deccan Development Society | 18 May 2005 a brochure about the need to protect traditional knowledge - why, how, by whom? a brochure about the need to protect traditional knowledge - why, how, by whom?
Uncultivated Food and the Poor by Deccan Development Society | 18 May 2005 a brief document outlining the importance and usefulness of uncultivated foods for the poor a brief document outlining the importance and usefulness of uncultivated foods for the poor
Public interest petition for a moratorium on the release of GMOs into the Indian environment and the need for biosafety testing by Co-petitioners: Aruna Rodrigues, Devinder Sharma, PV Satheesh, Rajeev Baruah | 14 May 2005
The Road from TRIPS-Minus, to TRIPS, to TRIPS-Plus: Implications of IPRs for the Arab World by Mohammed El-Said | 1 May 2005 This article sheds light on the evolution of free trade agreements (FTAs) and the IPR protection incorporated within such agreements. The emphasis is on the latest free trade and investment agreements concluded between the United States and the European Union (EU) with the Arab world and their "TRIPS-Plus" nature. Originally published in the Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol 8, No 1, January 2005. This article sheds light on the evolution of free trade agreements (FTAs) and the IPR protection incorporated within such agreements. The emphasis is on the latest free trade and investment agreements concluded between the United States and the European Union (EU) with the Arab world and their "TRIPS-Plus" nature. Originally published in the Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol 8, No 1, January 2005.
April 2005 by GRAIN | 30 Apr 2005 Seedling - April 2005 A bumper issue of a Seedling with a diverse number of articles from an editorial on Food Sovereignty, a discussion of the CBD ABS, a highly critical look at environmental services to articles on USAID and Bt cotton in Africa. A bumper issue of a Seedling with a diverse number of articles from an editorial on Food Sovereignty, a discussion of the CBD ABS, a highly critical look at environmental services to articles on USAID and Bt cotton in Africa.
Food Sovereignty: turning the global food system upside down by GRAIN | 29 Apr 2005 Seedling - April 2005 Food sovereignty is a solid alternative to the current mainstream thinking on food production. The struggle for food sovereignty incorporates such wide ranging issues as land reform, territo-rial control, local markets, biodiversity, autonomy, cooperation, debt, health, and many other issues that are of central importance to be able to produce food locally. Food sovereignty also brings together peasants and farmers from the North and South and allows different move-ments to come together in their struggles. Food sovereignty is a solid alternative to the current mainstream thinking on food production. The struggle for food sovereignty incorporates such wide ranging issues as land reform, territo-rial control, local markets, biodiversity, autonomy, cooperation, debt, health, and many other issues that are of central importance to be able to produce food locally. Food sovereignty also brings together peasants and farmers from the North and South and allows different move-ments to come together in their struggles.
Re-situating the benefits from biodiversity by GRAIN | 28 Apr 2005 Seedling - April 2005 In 2004, the members of the Convention on Biological Diversity started negotiating an "international regime on access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing". Many developing country governments are enthusiastic about this process. They speak about it as something which will put an end to biopiracy and finally realise the "fair and equitable sharing of benefits" derived from biodiversity, long promised by the CBD. In reality, the regime will have very little to do with benefit-sharing at all, much less with fair and equitable sharing. The focus will remain where it has always been in the CBD's discussions: on access to genes for research and commercialisation, and on setting a price for such access. The only new element likely to materialise in the regime is some form of international enforcement for national access legislations, possibly a system of certificates to prove that a genetic resource has been lawfully acquired. In 2004, the members of the Convention on Biological Diversity started negotiating an "international regime on access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing". Many developing country governments are enthusiastic about this process. They speak about it as something which will put an end to biopiracy and finally realise the "fair and equitable sharing of benefits" derived from biodiversity, long promised by the CBD. In reality, the regime will have very little to do with benefit-sharing at all, much less with fair and equitable sharing. The focus will remain where it has always been in the CBD's discussions: on access to genes for research and commercialisation, and on setting a price for such access. The only new element likely to materialise in the regime is some form of international enforcement for national access legislations, possibly a system of certificates to prove that a genetic resource has been lawfully acquired.
Bt cotton in South Africa: the case of the Makhathini farmers by Elfrieda Pschorn-Strauss | 26 Apr 2005 Seedling - April 2005 This article summarises the results of five years of research undertaken by Biowatch South Africa on the socio-economic impact of Bt cotton on small-scale farmers in South Africa. It forms part of a comprehensive research paper on the topic that will be published later this year. (This paper has been written by Elfrieda Pschorn-Strauss, a researcher with Biowatch South Africa. The research has been done with the assistance of Lawrence Mkhaliphi, Charles Louw, Wendy Forse and Gwendolyn Wellmann.) This article summarises the results of five years of research undertaken by Biowatch South Africa on the socio-economic impact of Bt cotton on small-scale farmers in South Africa. It forms part of a comprehensive research paper on the topic that will be published later this year. (This paper has been written by Elfrieda Pschorn-Strauss, a researcher with Biowatch South Africa. The research has been done with the assistance of Lawrence Mkhaliphi, Charles Louw, Wendy Forse and Gwendolyn Wellmann.)
USAID: Making the world hungry for GM crops by GRAIN | 25 Apr 2005 This briefing examines how the US government uses USAID to actively promote GM agriculture. The focus is on USAID's major programmes for agricultural biotechnology and the regions where these programmes are most active in parts of Africa and Asia[1]. These USAID programmes are part of a multi-pronged strategy to advance US interests with GM crops. Increasingly the US government uses multilateral and bilateral free trade agreements and high-level diplomatic pressure to push countries towards the adoption of many key bits of corporate-friendly regulations related to GM crops. And this external pressure has been effectively complimented by lobbying and funding from national and regional USAID biotech networks. This briefing examines how the US government uses USAID to actively promote GM agriculture. The focus is on USAID's major programmes for agricultural biotechnology and the regions where these programmes are most active in parts of Africa and Asia[1]. These USAID programmes are part of a multi-pronged strategy to advance US interests with GM crops. Increasingly the US government uses multilateral and bilateral free trade agreements and high-level diplomatic pressure to push countries towards the adoption of many key bits of corporate-friendly regulations related to GM crops. And this external pressure has been effectively complimented by lobbying and funding from national and regional USAID biotech networks.
USAID in Africa: 'For the American Corporations' by GRAIN | 24 Apr 2005 Seedling - April 2005 This article examines how the US government uses the International Agency for Development (USAID) to advance a global agenda for GM agriculture. The focus is on USAID’s major programmes for agricultural biotechnology in Africa. This article examines how the US government uses the International Agency for Development (USAID) to advance a global agenda for GM agriculture. The focus is on USAID’s major programmes for agricultural biotechnology in Africa.
No, air, don't sell yourself.... by GRAIN | 22 Apr 2005 Seedling - April 2005 The concept of “environmental services” has become popular over the last decade and has crept insidiously into our collective consciousness without setting off the alarm bells it should have done. Environmental services pro-vide the means of taking privatisation to a new level – a means of privatising many things that have as-yet been unavailable for privatisation: air, water and all sorts of other ecological processes. What has been undertaken so far in the name of environmental services, and what are the implications of turning such basic elements into commodities? The concept of “environmental services” has become popular over the last decade and has crept insidiously into our collective consciousness without setting off the alarm bells it should have done. Environmental services pro-vide the means of taking privatisation to a new level – a means of privatising many things that have as-yet been unavailable for privatisation: air, water and all sorts of other ecological processes. What has been undertaken so far in the name of environmental services, and what are the implications of turning such basic elements into commodities?
Resolution adopted at the FOE-Africa/TWN Conference on GMOs and Africa, 21-23 March 2005, Lagos, Nigeria by | 21 Apr 2005