Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? by GRAIN | 11 Jan 2004 Seedling - January 2004 We need more books like Information Feudalism. This important review of the history of intellectual property rights (IPRs) puts into perspective the pressure that we are all being subjected to by the push for stronger and stronger property rights over intangible assets. By “information feudalism” the authors refer to a project of visionaries that is currently being contested. We need more books like Information Feudalism. This important review of the history of intellectual property rights (IPRs) puts into perspective the pressure that we are all being subjected to by the push for stronger and stronger property rights over intangible assets. By “information feudalism” the authors refer to a project of visionaries that is currently being contested.
Trading in Knowledge:Development Perpsectives on TRIPS, Trade and Sustainability by GRAIN | 11 Jan 2004 Seedling - January 2004 Book review Book review
The Leech and the Earthworm - A film by Max Pugh and Mac Silver by GRAIN | 1 Jan 2004 Seedling - January 2004 Film review Produced by Debra Harry Run Time: 68 mins IPCB/Yeast Directions, 2003 Film review Produced by Debra Harry Run Time: 68 mins IPCB/Yeast Directions, 2003
Bt-cotton productivity considerations from India and China by Diemuth Pemsl, Jana Orphal and Hermann Waibul | 6 Oct 2003 Presentation to the Deutscher Tropentag Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Gottingen, October 8-10, 2003. It highlights some of the limitations with previous studies. Presentation to the Deutscher Tropentag Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Gottingen, October 8-10, 2003. It highlights some of the limitations with previous studies.
When elephants fight over GMOs by Tewolde Egziabher | 1 Oct 2003 Seedling - October 2003 As the world's attention was focusing firmly on the Cancun World Trade Organisation summit in September, an important international agreement quietly made its entry on the world stage, one which holds immense implications for developing countries. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety1, which aims to regulate trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), came into force on 11 September. The Protocol arrived after five long years of negotiations over intractable North-South issues that are set to continue to bedevil implementation. The tension around trade issues is highlighted most forcefully by the US move to take the European Union to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) dispute settlement mechanism over the EUs insistence that US exporters clearly label all GM food sold to Europe. One of the US main complaints is that Europes stance forces Africa to reject GM foods and crops. As the world's attention was focusing firmly on the Cancun World Trade Organisation summit in September, an important international agreement quietly made its entry on the world stage, one which holds immense implications for developing countries. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety1, which aims to regulate trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), came into force on 11 September. The Protocol arrived after five long years of negotiations over intractable North-South issues that are set to continue to bedevil implementation. The tension around trade issues is highlighted most forcefully by the US move to take the European Union to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) dispute settlement mechanism over the EUs insistence that US exporters clearly label all GM food sold to Europe. One of the US main complaints is that Europes stance forces Africa to reject GM foods and crops.