">
April 30, 2004
PRESS
RELEASE
AP Coalition in Defence of Diversity
Two years have passed since Bt Cotton cultivation was permitted in Andhra Pradesh. Nothing much has changed in its performance except for the hype by Mahyco Monsanto, the company which produces Bt cotton seeds in India.
This year weather gods were very benign to Warangal District in Andhra Pradesh which is the largest grower of Bt cotton in AP as well as in other cotton districts of AP. Rains occurred just at the right intervals in right quantities throughout the cotton cultivation period. This was what the Gods ordered for cotton. But in spite of this extraordinarily benevolent rain regime, Bt cotton's performance did not live upto even a fraction of the promises made by the industry.
As a matter of fact, the industry continuously makes several tall claims to promote Bt Cotton. Three of the most important claims are:
- Cultivation of Bt cotton will reduce pesticide use considerably
- Cultivation costs will come down significantly
- Profits for farmers will increase
On all three counts Bt Cotton failed in Andhra Pradesh for the second consecutive time. This is evident in this season long study for 2003-2004 taken up on behalf of the AP Coalition in Defence of Diversity by Mr Abdul Qayum and Mr Kiran Sakkhari, two agricultural scientists. The study conducted in three districts of AP viz. Adilabad, Warangal and Kurnool had a sizeable sample of nearly 164 farmers. They were studied almost on a day to day basis throughout the cotton cultivation period, from the date of sowing to the date of harvesting. In Warangal District the sample size was nearly 10% of all the farmers who cultivated Bt cotton in the district. Therefore what the study says bears a great significance to the entire Bt cotton phenomenon.
The number of very
interesting results point out to the fact that Bt cotton has
once again let down small and marginal farmers in the
dryland districts of Warangal, Adilabad and Kurnool in
Andhra Pradesh. The facts are :
- In comparison to non-Bt hybrids, pesticide use has not drastically come down in Bt cultivation
- Costs of cultivating Bt cotton is higher compared to non Bt cultivation
- The Bt
Cotton yields were barely 2% higher compared to non Bt
cotton.
- Having paid higher price for Bt seeds and investing more money on its cultivation, farmers in fact earned more profits through cultivation of non Bt cotton than through Bt Cotton
For us in the AP Coalition in Defence of Diversity, a matter of great concern is the hype built up around Bt cotton by the industry which directly contrasts with the findings of this painstaking year round study.
We would like to
particularly mention the Monsanto AC Nielsen study which is
making rounds all over the world, without being challenged.
The study paints extremely rosy picture for Bt cotton in
India, whereas the field realities are completely different.
Take two or three findings of the Monsanto study and compare
them with this study:
State | Bollworm
Pesticide Reduction %
Rs. | Yield
Increase %
qu/ac
| Increase in
Net
Profit %
Rs/ac | |||
Andhra Pradesh
[Monsanto
Study] | 58< o:p> | 185
6 | 24< o:p> | 1.9
8 | 92< o:p> | 513
8 |
Andhra
Pradesh <
i>[APCIDD Study] | 1
4 | 3
21 | 2
% | 0
.09 | (
-) 9% | (
-)750 |
This clearly points out how far from truth are the claims made by the study conducted by a marketing agency, which contacted farmers through questionnaires just once after their crop period. The APCIDD study which worked with farmers continuously contacting them every 15 days brings and therefore always close to the realities of the situation brings out the truth which counters the hollow claims of the industry.
False
claims
The industry has claimed four times more than the actual reduction in pesticide use, 12 times more yield and 100 times more profit than the actual. If left unchallenged, the industry which is losing ground in the rest of the world [including China] will completely overrun our agriculture and decimate farming as we know it.
Last when the results
of our study for 2002-2003 came out and unmasked the
disaster that Bt cotton had brought upon the farmers of
Warangal, there was a great outcry by the media which made
the government sit up and take notice of the tragedy it had
let loose on the farmers. It made the government institute
its own survey which clearly came out with the finding that
cost of cultivation for Bt was more and net returns were
too low in comparison with
non-Bt.
Later the then Minister for Agriculture Mr Shobhanadrishwara Rao made a public statement asking farmers to stay away from cultivation of Bt Cotton. But within a month or so the government went back on its statement and without an iota of remorse invited Monsanto to sell its Bt cotton seeds from the government outlets.
The result is that farmers who paid 3.5 times higher price for Bt seeds today suffer a loss of 9% compared to the farmers who cultivated non Bt cotton.
Will the government accountable to this loss? Will it ask the industry to compensate the farmers this loss?
And what about the ever deepening ecological crisis? As our scientists point out who will pay for the ecological costs the constant induction into soils, airs and water of the built in poison in Bt plants?
Erosion of
Regulatory Authority
Over the last two years, farmers merrily mixed Bt and Non Bt cotton when they took them to the market. Thus cotton seeds which are the source for edible oil and cattle feed have been contaminated with Bt. How will it affect human health, both by consuming cotton oil and milk from the cattle which have eaten Bt feed? Who is monitoring this? Why have the regulatory authorities totally abdicated their responsibility?
The profit hungry industry is not happy even with this sleeping authority. The latest moves from the powerful industrial lobby in India has been instrumental in a process that might completely dismantle the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee of the Ministry of Environment and Forests and hand over the control to an industry dominated committee in the name of a fast track approval.
As a consequence we are completely handing over the control over our agriculture, health, environment and our well being itself into the hands of an irresponsible industry which knows very little beyond its balance sheet.
This will be a tragedy of monumental proportions.
We sincerely request our media friends to start a media investigation into a process that will herald unspeakable harm to our health and ecological security
P V
Satheesh
Convenor